REHOBOTH, MA — In a move that has sparked intense debate over free speech and public duty, the Rehoboth Board of Selectmen voted 4-1 on Tuesday to officially remove Fire Chief Mark Haskell from his position.
The decision comes after a heated conflict involving a solar farm development that sits directly adjacent to Haskell’s private property. While the town leadership cites ethics violations, Haskell maintains he was simply doing his job by identifying potential fire hazards.
The Alleged Ethics Violation
The core of the dispute rests on whether Haskell used his official title for personal gain. According to town officials, Haskell violated ethics rules by:
- Attending public meetings to speak out against the solar farm project.
- Identifying himself as the Fire Chief during these discussions.
- Participating in debates where he reportedly had a “financial interest” due to his property value.
Town leadership argued that because the solar farm abuts his land, his public opposition as a high-ranking official created a conflict of interest that overstepped the bounds of his role.
“Safety, Not Money”: Haskell Defends His Actions
Chief Haskell has pushed back firmly against the board’s characterization of his motives. He asserts that his comments were focused entirely on public safety and fire risks—concerns that fall directly under his expertise as a fire professional.
Haskell argued that the project was already completed, meaning his testimony could not have resulted in any personal financial windfall.
“I have nothing to gain and nothing to lose,” Haskell told NBC affiliate WJAR. “The project’s already built; there’s nothing I could do that would render me whole as to the damage that’s already been done.”
What’s Next? Legal Battle Looming
The fallout from Tuesday’s vote is far from over. Haskell has already announced his intention to pursue legal action against the town for his removal.
The case highlights a growing tension in rural Massachusetts towns as residents and officials grapple with the rapid expansion of solar arrays. It raises a critical question for public servants: Can an official separate their professional expertise from their rights as a private property owner?
The Board of Selectmen has not yet named an interim chief or detailed the timeline for a permanent replacement.
What do you think, Rehoboth? Was the board right to fire the Chief for a conflict of interest, or should he be allowed to use his expertise to protect his neighborhood?
Share your thoughts in the comments below.
